The Homes Americans are Buying are Older Than Ever

by Jim Marks

  • The typical home bought in the U.S. hit a record age of 36 years in 2024—up from 27 years in 2012. 
  • Buyers pay less for older homes (over 30 years old) than for newer homes (under five years old), but the gap is shrinking. 
  • The typical home bought in Buffalo, NY in 2024 was 69 years old—the oldest among the 100 most populous metros—while the median home sold in Provo, UT was the youngest at six years old.
  • The U.S. has been building fewer homes since the global financial crisis upended the construction industry in 2008. Only 9% of America’s homes were built in the 2010s, the lowest share of any decade since the 1940s.

The typical home bought in the U.S. hit a record age of 36 years in 2024. That’s nine years older than the median age of homes purchased in 2012, highlighting how a lack of new construction over the past 15 years has fast-tracked the aging of America’s housing stock. 

!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}}))}();

This is according to a Redfin analysis of MLS data on the age of homes bought between 2012 (as far back as our records go) and 2024. The analysis refers to newer homes as being less than five years old and older homes as being more than 30 years old. Data refers to all home types (i.e. single family, condos and townhouses) combined unless otherwise specified. 

The homes people are buying are getting older across all types, with condos aging the most—to a median 38 years in 2024 from 26 years in 2012.

Median age of homes bought in years (built year)
2024 2012 Difference 2012→2024
All Homes 36 (1988) 27 (1985) 9 years
Single Family 36 (1988) 28 (1984) 8 years
Condos 38 (1986) 26 (1986) 12 years
Townhouses 23 (2001) 20 (1992) 3 years

Americans are increasingly buying older homes for two main reasons:

  • Lack of new supply: There have been fewer homes built in the past two decades in comparison to earlier decades. This is particularly true on the East Coast and in the Rust Belt, where the median age of sold homes can be more than 60 years.
  • Affordability: Older homes are generally cheaper than new homes, with the typical 30-plus-year-old home selling for 15% less than the median price of all homes.

“America’s housing stock is getting older by the year, and it’s not because buyers prefer vintage homes—it’s because we haven’t built enough new ones,” said Redfin Senior Economist Sheharyar Bokhari. “Without more construction, buyers are forced to choose from a pool of aging properties that present a new set of financial challenges, especially for those trying to save enough money to climb onto the property ladder. Older homes have aging systems, energy inefficiencies, and a steady stream of maintenance costs that can quickly add up after move-in.”

Less than 10% of U.S. homes were built in the 2010s

The U.S. has been building fewer homes since the global financial crisis upended the construction industry in 2008. Only 9% of America’s homes were built in the 2010s, the lowest share of any decade since the 1940s—when World War II put a halt to construction.

!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}}))}();

Residential construction in the 2020s has picked up pace slightly, thanks in part to the pandemic-fueled building boom in many Sun Belt and Mountain West states. Still, at current speeds, the number of homes built is projected to be the second lowest of any decade since the 1940s.

The gap between the price of newer homes and older homes is shrinking 

The typical price paid for a newer home (<5 years old) in 2024 was $425,000, 31.6% more than the $323,000 paid for an older home (30+ years old). In 2012, buyers paid 77.9% more for a newer home ($243,730 vs. $137,000).

!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}}))}();

Older homes have traditionally been more affordable than newer ones due to factors such as depreciation, outdated features, and the potential need for repairs. Unlike new construction, which typically includes modern designs, updated systems, and energy-efficient materials, older homes may require significant upgrades to meet current standards. 

Buyers are paying a smaller premium for newer homes and receiving a smaller discount for older homes

In 2024, homebuyers paid 11.8% more for a newer home (<5 years old), compared to the median home price. In 2012, buyers paid 44.4% more. 

!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}}))}();

At the same time, buyers are no longer getting as big a discount for purchasing an older home. In 2024, the typical older home (30+ years old) sold for 15% less than the median home price. In 2012, buyers paid 18.9% less.

There are several reasons why the price gap between newer homes and older homes is shrinking:

  • More affordable home types: Builders are constructing smaller, lower-cost homes, like townhouses, which now make up nearly 20% of new housing—a record high.
  • Construction in cheaper areas: More new homes are being built in traditionally affordable regions, such as the Sun Belt and Mountain West. Demand in some of these areas (like Florida and Texas) is now declining, causing home prices to fall and listings to surge.
  • Prices rising in older metros: Strong demand in areas with older housing stock—such as metros on the East Coast and in the Rust Belt—is helping to drive up prices of older homes.

The typical home bought in Buffalo last year was 69 years old, while in Provo it was only 6

The typical home that sold in Buffalo, NY in 2024 was 69 years old—the oldest among the 100 most populous metros (with sufficient data) that Redfin analyzed. Highlighting the lack of new inventory, only 2.6% of bought homes in Buffalo were less than five years old. 

Metros with the oldest homes bought in 2024
Median age 

(built year)

Median price

<5 years old 

(share of homes sold)

Median price 

30+ years old 

(share of homes sold)

Buffalo, NY 69 (1955) $527,500 (2.6%) $249,000 (87.3%)
Pittsburgh, PA 68 (1956) $460,000 (4.5%) $211,000 (81.2%)
Syracuse, NY 65 (1959) $484,400 (2.8%) $222,100 (85.4%)
Springfield, MA 65 (1959) $549,950 (3.4%) $322,000 (84.3%)
Cleveland, OH 65 (1959) $460,000 (4.0%) $205,000 (80.5%)

Next came Pittsburgh where the median home that sold was 68 years old, followed by Syracuse, NY, Springfield, MA and Cleveland—all of which had a median age of 65 years.

Standing out among these metros is the wide gap between the median price of newer homes and older homes, with homes over 30 years old typically selling for less than half the price of those built in the past five years.

“Older homes may cost less upfront, but the cost of repairing or replacing big ticket items can be a huge burden for buyers,” said Jerry Quade, a Redfin Premier agent in Cleveland. “We always take a close look at the plumbing and electrical systems, along with the concrete foundations and the roof. Most of the old homes in Cleveland have basements, so we also look for any signs of water intrusion. At the end of the day, getting a building inspection is critical.” 

It’s a very different story in Provo, UT, where the typical home that sold last year was only six years old—the youngest of the metros Redfin analyzed. The price of an older home ($479,900) in Provo was nearly as high as a newer home ($490,000). 

Metros with the youngest homes bought in 2024
Median age 

(built year)

Median price

<5 years old 

(share of homes sold)

Median price 

30+ years old 

(share of homes sold)

Provo, UT 6 (2018) $490,000 (46.6%) $479,900 (17.3%)
Austin, TX 8 (2016) $420,000 (41.6%) $475,000 (20.7%)
Boise City, ID 8 (2016) $499,516 (44.1%) $429,900 (22.1%)
San Antonio, TX 8 (2016) $310,000 (44.7%) $249,250 (24.4%)
Raleigh, NC 9 (2015) $434,700 (41.1%) $400,000 (20%)

Next came Austin, TX, Boise City, ID and San Antonio, TX—where the median home that sold was eight years old. 

Austin is one of only four metros we analyzed (the others being Oxnard, CA, San Jose, CA and San Francisco) where the median price of a home over 30 years old cost more last year than a home built in the past five years.

“The only four listings I’ve had this year with multiple offers were older homes,” said Andrew Vallejo, a Redfin Premier agent in Austin. “They had all been renovated and were in good proximity to the tech companies, bars and restaurants. We are experiencing a severe downturn in Austin, but older homes within the city’s core—while rare—are still moving fast when they are listed.”

Raleigh, NC rounded out the five metros with the youngest home purchases, with the typical sold home being nine years old.

Metro Table – Age of Homes Bought in 2024

Metro Median age Median year built Share <5 years old Share 30+ years old Median price <5 years old Median price 30+ years old
Akron, OH 63 1961 3.3% 78.0% $ 393,500 $ 191,000
Albany, NY 56 1968 7.9% 74.8% $ 616,376 $ 294,000
Allentown, PA 56 1968 6.2% 73.0% $ 501,745 $ 299,000
Atlanta, GA 24 2000 20.9% 38.4% $ 444,990 $ 335,000
Augusta, GA 17 2007 33.6% 36.2% $ 319,950 $ 215,000
Austin, TX 8 2016 41.6% 20.7% $ 420,000 $ 475,000
Bakersfield, CA 35 1989 13.2% 56.6% $ 464,900 $ 310,000
Baltimore, MD 49 1975 7.4% 71.1% $ 560,000 $ 335,000
Birmingham, AL 32 1992 17.1% 51.5% $ 338,410 $ 218,000
Boise City, ID 8 2016 44.1% 22.1% $ 499,516 $ 429,900
Boston, MA 55 1969 10.4% 72.4% $ 875,000 $ 640,000
Bridgeport, CT 56 1968 3.8% 81.3% $ 1,597,500 $ 584,900
Buffalo, NY 69 1955 2.6% 87.3% $ 527,500 $ 249,000
Cape Coral, FL 19 2005 30.1% 29.2% $ 380,000 $ 329,900
Charleston, SC 15 2009 36.4% 28.8% $ 421,390 $ 415,000
Chicago, IL 48 1976 6.9% 66.5% $ 481,918 $ 300,000
Cincinnati, OH 46 1978 8.0% 64.4% $ 409,600 $ 250,000
Cleveland, OH 65 1959 4.0% 80.5% $ 460,000 $ 205,000
Columbus, OH 37 1987 13.7% 56.1% $ 470,000 $ 275,000
Dallas, TX 19 2005 31.6% 34.5% $ 411,274 $ 325,000
Dayton, OH 59 1965 6.1% 78.4% $ 385,000 $ 195,000
Deltona, FL 26 1998 25.3% 45.6% $ 374,990 $ 300,000
Denver, CO 32 1992 16.0% 51.2% $ 600,000 $ 535,000
Des Moines, IA 24 2000 26.9% 44.8% $ 364,998 $ 221,750
Detroit, MI 59 1965 5.9% 76.1% $ 520,000 $ 227,000
Durham, NC 21 2003 25.1% 36.3% $ 460,116 $ 370,000
El Paso, TX 12 2012 38.3% 29.4% $ 290,950 $ 205,000
Fresno, CA 40 1984 6.8% 63.7% $ 489,000 $ 355,000
Grand Rapids, MI 42 1982 12.5% 60.6% $ 445,000 $ 293,000
Greensboro, NC 32 1992 20.8% 51.7% $ 345,000 $ 239,900
Greenville, SC 17 2007 35.2% 30.6% $ 340,000 $ 295,000
Harrisburg, PA 48 1976 11.6% 65.8% $ 416,990 $ 240,000
Hartford, CT 56 1968 3.1% 82.9% $ 617,500 $ 332,000
Houston, TX 16 2008 35.1% 30.9% $ 345,990 $ 270,000
Indianapolis, IN 30 1994 18.7% 49.3% $ 390,000 $ 237,000
Jackson, MS 29 1995 16.4% 48.5% $ 366,900 $ 175,000
Jacksonville, FL 18 2006 35.0% 33.6% $ 400,000 $ 300,000
Knoxville, TN 27 1997 25.9% 45.4% $ 434,000 $ 318,500
Lakeland, FL 12 2012 42.8% 28.4% $ 334,990 $ 248,000
Las Vegas, NV 22 2002 19.1% 26.7% $ 492,925 $ 370,000
Little Rock, AR 26 1998 20.5% 45.5% $ 326,000 $ 180,000
Los Angeles, CA 53 1971 4.9% 80.1% $ 1,170,000 $ 920,000
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY 45 1979 12.4% 60.5% $ 350,000 $ 233,000
Madison, WI 29 1995 17.9% 47.5% $ 509,020 $ 373,000
McAllen, TX 15 2009 35.5% 23.1% $ 265,000 $ 175,000
Memphis, TN 34 1990 15.8% 54.9% $ 377,850 $ 205,000
Miami, FL 41 1983 5.2% 67.2% $ 745,000 $ 425,000
Milwaukee, WI 58 1966 7.0% 73.4% $ 585,000 $ 301,700
Minneapolis, MN 37 1987 15.2% 57.1% $ 490,000 $ 349,900
Nashville, TN 12 2012 38.1% 29.1% $ 482,228 $ 389,900
New Haven, CT 57 1967 3.7% 84.9% $ 610,000 $ 340,000
New Orleans, LA 39 1985 15.1% 59.0% $ 320,000 $ 245,750
New York, NY 60 1964 5.0% 79.6% $ 1,088,825 $ 620,000
North Port, FL 20 2004 32.9% 37.6% $ 468,300 $ 375,000
Ogden, UT 26 1998 19.4% 44.7% $ 569,000 $ 423,000
Oklahoma City, OK 25 1999 24.4% 45.5% $ 335,000 $ 196,500
Omaha, NE 37 1987 18.7% 54.5% $ 425,000 $ 250,000
Orlando, FL 21 2003 26.1% 35.7% $ 446,490 $ 335,000
Oxnard, CA 45 1979 4.4% 76.0% $ 779,495 $ 835,000
Palm Bay, FL 28 1996 26.3% 47.7% $ 385,000 $ 300,000
Philadelphia, PA 61 1963 6.0% 77.5% $ 558,150 $ 330,000
Phoenix, AZ 23 2001 20.9% 35.8% $ 459,995 $ 410,000
Pittsburgh, PA 68 1956 4.5% 81.2% $ 460,000 $ 211,000
Portland, OR 31 1993 19.2% 50.3% $ 580,540 $ 525,000
Poughkeepsie, NY 51 1973 5.4% 74.6% $ 649,000 $ 400,000
Providence, RI 56 1968 7.7% 76.9% $ 610,000 $ 439,000
Provo, UT 6 2018 46.6% 17.3% $ 490,000 $ 479,900
Raleigh, NC 9 2015 41.1% 20.0% $ 434,700 $ 400,000
Richmond, VA 33 1991 21.4% 52.6% $ 476,175 $ 335,000
Riverside, CA 34 1990 13.8% 53.8% $ 610,285 $ 517,500
Rochester, NY 64 1960 2.7% 85.0% $ 465,625 $ 232,850
Sacramento, CA 36 1988 10.5% 57.5% $ 666,275 $ 510,000
Salt Lake City, UT 29 1995 20.8% 48.6% $ 524,729 $ 510,000
San Antonio, TX 8 2016 44.7% 24.4% $ 310,000 $ 249,250
San Diego, CA 43 1981 4.3% 71.0% $ 910,000 $ 855,000
San Francisco, CA 56 1968 3.6% 79.0% $ 1,160,063 $ 1,175,000
San Jose, CA 51 1973 5.4% 74.7% $ 1,557,500 $ 1,612,250
Scranton, PA 64 1960 4.1% 79.2% $ 384,900 $ 200,500
Seattle, WA 34 1990 17.5% 53.5% $ 838,975 $ 700,000
Spokane, WA 44 1980 18.1% 58.6% $ 468,585 $ 370,000
Springfield, MA 65 1959 3.4% 84.3% $ 549,950 $ 322,000
Stockton, CA 35 1989 14.6% 55.2% $ 683,395 $ 441,250
Syracuse, NY 65 1959 2.8% 85.4% $ 484,800 $ 222,100
Tampa, FL 34 1990 22.5% 52.6% $ 400,265 $ 335,000
Toledo, OH 64 1960 4.8% 78.4% $ 439,138 $ 171,000
Tucson, AZ 26 1998 20.5% 43.2% $ 399,000 $ 320,000
Tulsa, OK 39 1985 16.9% 55.6% $ 380,000 $ 210,000
Urban Honolulu, HI 48 1976 5.0% 73.8% $ 934,270 $ 620,000
Virginia Beach, VA 38 1986 12.8% 62.2% $ 443,035 $ 305,000
Washington, DC 37 1987 12.3% 59.3% $ 625,500 $ 515,000
Wichita, KS 45 1979 13.9% 62.6% $ 349,900 $ 175,950
Winston, NC 27 1997 26.8% 46.5% $ 339,990 $ 250,000
Worcester, MA 48 1976 9.4% 69.9% $ 583,000 $ 405,000
United States of America 36 1988 17.1% 54.7% $ 425,000 $ 323,000

The post The Homes Americans are Buying are Older Than Ever appeared first on Redfin Real Estate News.

agent

Jim Marks

Broker Associate | RSAB068681

+1(610) 705-4014

GET MORE INFORMATION

Full Name
Phone*
Message